Archive for March, 2007

Punishment and Deterrance 2 Part 3

Friday, March 30th, 2007

 
The 8th amendment of the U.S constitution protects individuals and inmates from cruel and unusual punishment. According to Brownstein “Guards now punish inmates who refuse to work or misbehave by taking away privileges such as phone, visitation, and solitary confinement.” (Alabama’s ‘unusual” Legacy) In correctional institutions the purpose is still punishment; however, their methods have [...]

Punishment and Deterrance 2 Part 2

Tuesday, March 27th, 2007

The purpose of jails and prisons are to punish the offenders. Correctional institutions are responsible for carrying out punishments and sentences given by courts. Maximum security prison facilities like Attica, Sing Sing, Elmira Reformatory and Clinton state prison were developed in the early 1900’s. These facilities were known to have correctional officers take punishment into [...]

Punishment and Deterrence 2 Part 1

Saturday, March 24th, 2007

Punishment and Deterrence: how it has changed throughout time?
Are physical and bloody methods of punishment effective in deterring criminals? Does the thought of being humiliated and ridiculed in front of others make you think twice about committing a crime? Criminal acts have always had consequences punishable by law. There are several methods of punishments used [...]

Punishment for Criminal Offense Part 4

Wednesday, March 21st, 2007

 
 I don’t think that the punishments themselves are what of kind of being blown out of proportion, it is the sentencing. Giving someone twenty years in jail for possession of cocaine in my mind is ridiculous. There is no doubt in my mind that it is a despicable thing to do, but it is not [...]

Punishment for Criminal Offense Part 3

Sunday, March 18th, 2007

 
 In addition, Luther M. White was placed on probation for thirty years and also banned from doing business with the FDOT. He was separately fined ten-thousand dollars and made liable with the company for restitution and costs. Mr. White was a family member who ran the company. This investigation was initiated by the Office of [...]